Legal Opinion

James G. Wiley Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 13, 1962No. 66961; protest 59/29022(A) (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The articles involved in this protest are concededly electric motors of less than one-tenth horsepower. They were classified as parts of toys and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53877. An additional assessment under the provisions of section 4541 of the Internal Revenue Code, based on the copper content of the merchandise, is not disputed. Plaintiff claims that the electric motors in question are properly classifiable under the provision in paragraph 353 of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Elder v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Polks Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Josiah Wedgwood & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Gamble Vargish & Co. v. Untied StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Servo-Tek Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. A & A Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Buckley Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API