Legal Opinion

Elder v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 3, 1962No. 66651; protests 60/4527, etc. (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise in this case consists of certain electric motors, identified as “Model No. 35S2610,” which were classified as parts of toys and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified. An additional assessment under the provisions of section 4541 of the Internal Revenue Code, based on the copper content of the merchandise, is not disputed. Plaintiffs claim that the electric motors in question are properly classifiable under the provision in paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Josiah Wedgwood & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. James G. Wiley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Polk's Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API