Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Farris

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2004No. 04-1964-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

¶ 1. This case is before this court under SCR 22.121 on a stipulation between the parties, Attorney Larry Farris and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). The stipulation consists of Attorney Farris's admission of the facts and misconduct alleged by the OLR and his agreement to the level of discipline that the OLR is seeking.

¶ 2. We accept the stipulation and determine that the seriousness of Attorney Farris's misconduct warrants the imposition of the recommended 60-day license suspension.

¶ 3. Attorney Farris was admitted to the practice of law in Wisconsin in 1973. He has no prior…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. BriggsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API