Legal Opinion

Elmore v. Continental Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1930No. 29,474PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marspiall, J.:

The plaintiff, as the assignee of the insured named in a policy of life insurance, sued to recover the amount named in the policy. Mabel F. Spickler and Marjorie Mae Spickler were made parties defendant and claimed as beneficiaries. They asked that $6,000 be paid to Mabel F. Spickler as guardian of Marjorie Mae Spickler, a minor, and that $5,000 be paid to her personally. The insurance company paid the money into court to abide the order thereof. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and Mabel F. Spickler appeals for herself…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Antrim v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Shawnee State Bank v. Royal Union Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Lemley v. McClureSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Bank of Idana v. Illinois Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API