Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Bank of California
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
The appellant questions no fact found by the trial court, hut assigns errors upon the conclusions drawn from the admitted facts.
Edwin H. Flick in his lifetime procured a policy of insurance upon his life to be written by the plaintiff, which was continued in force until the death of Mr. Flick. Some time prior to his death, Mr. Flick assigned, or attempted to assign, this policy to Florence E. Gilson as security for loans and advances made by her to him which, at the time of Mr. Flick’s death, exceeded the amount which then became payable under the life insurance policy. The assignment was not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Antley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Potter v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Schade v. Western Union Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Elmore v. Continental Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Occidental Life Insurance v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Towey v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- AETNA LIFE INSURANCE v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Toulouse v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Decker v. New York Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.