Legal Opinion

Heine v. Rohner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Arnold B. Heine and Jacob Bohner against Johannes. Bohner and Anton Iglauer for an injunction. From an order granting the relief prayed, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought against. Johannes Bohner and Anton Iglauer to restrain them from importing into the United States or Canada any goods known as “schiffle” embroidery, and from selling or exhibiting for sale any of such goods. It aj)pears that on the 1st of July, 1897, the firm of A. B. Heine & Co., composed of Arnold B. Heine and Jacob Rohner, were doing business in the city of New York, and that the firm of Jacob Rohner & Co., composed of Jacob Rohner and the defendant Johannes Rohner, were manufacturers of embroideries in Switzerland. On that date the said two firms entered into an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heine v. RohnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Hudson Valley Railway Co. v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Reynolds v. WebberNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Waskey v. McNaughtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  5. Woodburn v. HyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API