Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Webber

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for injunction by John F. Reynolds against William Webber and others. Motion denied, and order to show cause vacated.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsby, J.

[1] This is a motion for an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with plaintiff’s possession of the Brighton Beach Hotel, and restoring plaintiff to his possession thereof. The motion is not made upon a complaint. Only a summons is served with the moving affidavits. ■ It is therefore only from the affidavits that the nature of the action can be ascertained. Plaintiff’s affidavit sets forth a number of grounds and then states:

“I have caused the summons to be issued herein and an action against all of the defendants for injury to property by reason of the foregoing acts of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bachman v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Black v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. McHenry v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Fults v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Brass v. . RathboneNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eastern Farms Products, Inc. v. Wampsville Dairymen's Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API