Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Waskey v. McNaught

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1908No. 1,517Published

1ConcurrenceGilbert, Circuit Judge

Congress has abolished the distinction between actions at law and suits in equity in Alaska, and has enacted a statute authorizing, pending an action, the provisional remedy of injunction upon certain prescribed conditions. The question here is: What is the proper construction of that statute? It provides for the issuance of an injunction pendente lite in two distinct classes of cases: First, cases where it appears by the complaint that the plaintiff is entitled to such relief; and, second, in any case when it appears by affidavit that a defendant is doing, or threatening to do, certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McHenry v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Goldman v. CornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. College Corner & Richmond Gravel Road Co. v. MossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Riemer v. JohnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Heine v. RohnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API