Legal Opinion
HEINZ v. DUBELL LUMBER CO.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 19, 2022No. 1:19-cv-08778Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE __________________________________ : BERNARD HEINZ, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil No. 19-8778 (RBK/EAP) v. : : OPINION DUBELL LUMBER CO., : : Defendant. : __________________________________ : KUGLER, United States District Judge: Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Bernard Heinz’s Renewed Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 22). This motion is unopposed. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Defendant DuBell Lumber Company…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.