Legal Opinion

Rambo v. Chicago, Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1935No. 30,480PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff recovered for the death of her husband by defendant’s wrongful act. It moved for -judgment non obstante, but not for a new trial. It appeals from the judgment.

Plaintiff’s decedent, Roy C. Rambo, had for many years been in the employ of defendant as a signal maintainer of its tracks, and for some time prior to and up to the moment of his death had charge of defendant’s track from Empire to Dennison, residing at Randolph, north of Dennison. He used a gasolene speeder in his work. He was run doAvn three and a half miles south of Hampton by defendant’s passenger…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GroegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. HadleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago Great Western Railroad v. RamboSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Rambo v. Chicago Great Western Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API