Legal Opinion

State v. Roper

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1968No. 6825SC425PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMallard, C.J.

Defendant contends that the bill of indictment is fatally defective in failing to identify the premises with sufficient certainty to enable him to prepare his defense and afford him protection from another prosecution for the same incident. This contention is without merit.

The pertinent part of the bill of indictment alleges: “That James Edward Roper County of Burke on the 13th day of June, A.D., 1967, with force and arms at and in the county aforesaid, a certain dwelling house and building occupied by one Henry Lane . . .”

Defendant attempts to raise the question of the sufficiency of *96the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. FuquaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. PartlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ShanklinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API