Legal Opinion

State v. Shanklin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1972No. 7215SC793PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendants’ first two assignments of error challenge the denial of motions to quash the respective bills of indictment. Defendants argue that the location of the building allegedly broken into is not stated and that the ownership of the property alleged to have been stolen is not indicated. The bill of indictment must allege all essential elements of the alleged offense with sufficient certainty so as to identify the offense, protect the accused from being twice placed in jeopardy, enable the accused to prepare of trial and support a judgment entered upon a plea or conviction.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ElamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Brooks v. Taylor Tobacco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. CumberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Brock v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API