Legal Opinion

In Re LaRose

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 2, 1982No. 33-81PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Robert LaRose appeals from an order of the Wind-ham Superior Court granting his petition for post-conviction relief on the ground that the remedy ordered by the court was inadequate. We affirm.

On January 28, 1980, the appellant concluded a plea bargain with the prosecution on pending sexual assault charges. The defendant, on his part, agreed to withdraw his not guilty plea and plead guilty; in return, the prosecution agreed to recommend a sentence of five to fifteen years incarceration. Pursuant to V.R.Cr.P. 11, the plea agreement was recorded in open court, and the presiding judge informed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. MoquinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. In Re ShaimasSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. State v. PlattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API