Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 22, 1993No. 92-206PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Lawrence Coleman appeals from a district court order that denied his motion to clarify or modify his conditions of probation. We affirm.

Defendant was charged with sexually assaulting a minor under the age of sixteen. He entered into a plea agreement with the State in which he agreed to plead nolo contendere to a reduced charge of lewdness in viola*639tion of 13 V.S.A. § 2632(a)(8). The plea was entered pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), which held that a criminal defendant may voluntarily assent to a charge while maintaining innocence. Id. at 37. The State agreed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. ByrneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. State v. DuvalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. State v. SanbornSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. State v. FiskSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. In Re ShaimasSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. State of Tennessee v. Westley A. AlbrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API