State v. Coleman
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant Lawrence Coleman appeals from a district court order that denied his motion to clarify or modify his conditions of probation. We affirm.
Defendant was charged with sexually assaulting a minor under the age of sixteen. He entered into a plea agreement with the State in which he agreed to plead nolo contendere to a reduced charge of lewdness in viola*639tion of 13 V.S.A. § 2632(a)(8). The plea was entered pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), which held that a criminal defendant may voluntarily assent to a charge while maintaining innocence. Id. at 37. The State agreed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. ByrneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. DuvalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. SanbornSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. FiskSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- In Re ShaimasSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State of Tennessee v. Westley A. AlbrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.