Legal Opinion

MUNROE

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2014No. ID 3817PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

26 I&N Dec. 428

(BIA 2014) Interim Decision #3817 Matter of Keisha MUNROE, Respondent Decided October 24, 2014 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals For purposes of establishing an alien’s eligibility for a waiver under section 216(c)(4)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4)(A) (2012), the relevant period for determining whether an alien’s removal would result in extreme hardship is the 2-year period for which the alien was admitted as a conditional permanent resident. FOR RESPONDENT: Spiro Serras,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. A-ABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wisam Yousif v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Gitau v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. PANGAN-SISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
  4. Chen v. WolfDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API