Legal Opinion

Rose v. Fritz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 5, 2001No. 24226-5-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

The defendants appeal an order setting aside a written summary judgment of dismissal without prejudice. We reverse the order and reinstate the judgment.

From September 25, 1995 to October 4, 1995, Patricia *118Rose received medical care from Anthony Fritz, M.D., and Helmuth F. Fritz, M.D. On October 6, 1995, she died. She is survived by her husband, Arne Rose.

On August 8, 1996, Rose sued the doctors for negligence. He alleged that he was “the personal representative of the Estate of Patricia Rose.”1 In fact, however, he had never submitted his wife’s will for probate or had himself appointed as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kemmer v. KeiskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Kemmer v. KeiskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Campbell v. Swedish Club Cultural CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  4. Campbell v. Swedish Club Cultural CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  5. Estate Of Doris MathewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API