Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Resendiz-Ponce

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 11, 2005No. 04-10302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

Juan Resendiz-Ponce, a native and citizen of Mexico, challenges his conviction and sentence for attempting to reenter the United States after having been previously deported subsequent to committing an aggravated felony, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). He argues that (1) the indictment did not adequately allege an overt act; (2) his Miranda rights were violated; (3) the judge erroneously rejected his proffered jury instructions; and (4) his sentence violates the Sixth Amendment. Because the indictment was insufficient and should be dismissed, we do not reach his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-UlibarryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Du BoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Rafael RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Quentin Hinton, AKA Ronnie BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Resendiz-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. Jose Flores-Sanchez, A.K.A. Jose Mendoza-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Resendiz-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. People v. WitherspoonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. People v. WitherspoonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API