Jackson v. State

The defendant made a motion to “quash the indictment herein and the venire,” because the sheriff served a summons on Eugene B. Hanby, who qualified as a jurór, and the list of jurors served on defendant from which to select a jury contained the name of Eugene B. Handley. It was shown that these were one and the same. There is no merit in the motion for several reasons: (1) The motion is to quash both the indictment and the venire from which the jury to try the case was to be selected. Certainly a defect in tbis venire could not affect the indictment. (2) It was shown that Eugene B. Hanby and…