John v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the thrice incarnated affidavit of merit requirement found in Okla. Stat. tit. 12, 19.1 (SuppV 2013), is unconstitutional. In the wake of Zeier v. Zimmer, 2006 OK 98, 152 P.3d 861, its sequel Wall v. Marouk, 2013 OK 36, 302 P.3d 775, and upon reexamination of the Oklahoma Constitution, the inevitable conclusion is that section 19.1 is an impermissible barrier to court access and an unconstitutional special law. Section 19.1 is stricken.
I
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶2 On October 30, 2012, Saint Francis Hospital, Inc., Neurological Surgery,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McGehee v. Southwest Electronic EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- SHAWAREB v. SSM HEALTH CARE OF OKLAHOMASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- MULLENDORE v. MERCY HOSPITAL ARDMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Lind v. Barnes Tag Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.