Legal Opinion

Wright v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1979No. 77-2265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The parents and guardian of a child injured in a swimming pool accident appeal a summary judgment in favor of the government in an action for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We affirm.

The relevant factors are undisputed. The injuries were serious, and the negligence alleged would have made out a claim for relief against the swimming-pool operator. The operator, however, is insolvent.

The issue before us is whether the federal government, as a lender of money to the Sleeping Buffalo Recreation Association through one of its federal lending agencies, could be liable for the damages…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Antonio Ramos Perez v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
  2. Other Bull v. U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Solecki v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1988
  4. Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API