Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 24, 1989No. C-87-4175 MHPPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2678 and 2680, to recover for injuries sustained in the course of his employment as a private security inspector assigned to premises owned by the United States and leased to Sandia National Laboratories. The case is now before the court on the government’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having considered the written and oral submissions of the parties, for the following reasons, the court…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Globex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. SweetDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Lebron Diaz v. General Security Services Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
- Vallier v. Jet Propulsion LaboratoryDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Homestead Insurance v. Ryness Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.