Legal Opinion
Other Bull v. U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau of Indian Affairs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1994No. 92-35257Published
1Opinion of the Court
15 F.3d 1088
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Morton Other BULL, Sr., Personal Representative of the
Estate of Alonzo Other Bull; Margaret Other Bull;
Raynard Other Bull, individually,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS; United States of
America; Crow Tribal Housing Authority,
Defendants-Appellees.
No.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Stock West, Inc. v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Turf Paradise, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Arizona Downs, an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.