Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Kingston

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1974No. Crim. 25245PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON, J.—

The Case

By information, William Russell Kingston, Jr. (hereinafter referred to as defendant) was charged with incest in violation of Penal Code section 285, with statutory rape in violation of Penal Code section 261.5, and with violating section 288 of the Penal Code—lewd and lascivious act against a child. Defendant pleaded not guilty.

Defendant personally and by counsel waived jury trial and agreed to have the case submitted to the court on the preliminary transcript as to the charge of Penal Code section 288. Defendant was found guilty of the charge.

Criminal proceedings…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. HobbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. NothnagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. IngramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. MeachamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. People v. GoodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API