Legal Opinion
Molden v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 3, 1987No. Nos. 376-84C, 377-84CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This is a civilian pay case which comes before this court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ actions have been consolidated under Rule 19(a)(2)(ii) of the United States Claims Court. The Claims Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this suit under 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982).1
Plaintiffs are female Employment Opportunity Specialists with the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs in Chicago. They are employed at the GS-11 pay grade and allege that male Employment Opportunity Specialists in the Chicago offices of the Office of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 57, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,123 Lola Kouba, A/K/A Lola Hogan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, in Intervention-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mansfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Parker v. BurnleyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
- Hauschild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Lissak v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.