Legal Opinion

Lissak v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 17, 2001No. 99-756CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BASKIR, Chief Judge.

This case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, two female employees of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), allege Defendant violated the Equal Pay Act (the Act) by paying them less than male co-workers who perform the same duties. The Court finds that the pay disparity results from a bona-fide, gender-neutral, acceptable personnel policy. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion is granted.

The Court denies Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment because, among other reasons, Plaintiffs have failed to establish a prima facie case…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Cohens v. Maryland Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  3. Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Yant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Behm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API