Lissak v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, two female employees of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), allege Defendant violated the Equal Pay Act (the Act) by paying them less than male co-workers who perform the same duties. The Court finds that the pay disparity results from a bona-fide, gender-neutral, acceptable personnel policy. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion is granted.
The Court denies Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment because, among other reasons, Plaintiffs have failed to establish a prima facie case…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mansfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Cohens v. Maryland Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Yant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Behm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.