Legal Opinion

Natasha F. Hortenberry v. Thomas Palmer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 2013No. 10A04-1301-CT-17PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Thomas Palmer attempted to initiate a negligence action against Natasha F. Hor-tenberry, but the check he sent to the clerk along with the complaint was $2 less than the applicable filing fee. By the time that Palmer realized the mistake and rectified it, the statute of limitations had run. Palmer filed a motion with the trial court requesting that the complaint be treated as if it had been timely filed, and the court granted the motion. On the same day that the motion was granted, an attorney entered an appearance for Hortenberry, and when he realized that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Young v. Noble Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In re the Paternity of M. D. H.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Ray-Hayes v. HEINAMANN.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. Bradley T. Maynard (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. EMBERTON v. WINKLEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
  3. Jones v. RamosDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  4. Justin Gordon v. Terex CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026
  5. Mitchell Sigman v. State of Indiana and Sharon Hawk (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API