Legal Opinion

In re the Paternity of M. D. H.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1982No. 1-981A285PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Presiding Judge.

STATEMENT OF CASE

In this consolidated interlocutory appeal three putative fathers object to denials of their individual motions to dismiss petitions to establish paternity in support proceedings. We affirm in each case.

FACTS

On October 20, 1980, the Warrick County Department of Public Welfare filed a petition, “In the Matter of the Paternity of C. D. M.,” in the Warrick Superior Court, Juvenile Division, seeking to establish the paternity of C. D. M. born January 4, 1977. On November 24, 1980, a default judgment was entered against the alleged father. Upon defendant’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Division of Human Services ex rel. Mary C.M. v. Benjamin P.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Frideres v. SchiltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. Kemper v. Warren Petroleum Corp. Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Matter of Estate of WeidmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API