Legal Opinion

Ray-Hayes v. HEINAMANN.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 2002No. 89S05-0201-CV-306PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

2Per curiam

We grant transfer to resolve a conflict between the Court of Appeals' opinion in this case, Ray-Hayes v. Heinamann, 743 N.E.2d 777 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), and another opinion, Fort Wayne International Airport v. Wilburn, 723 N.E.2d 967 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), trans. denied. These two opinions disagree over whether a civil action is timely commenced if the plaintiff files a complaint within the applicable statute of limitations but does not tender the summons to the clerk within that statutory period. We hold that in such cireum-stances the action is not timely.

In Wilburn, the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fort Wayne International Airport v. WilburnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Ray-Hayes v. HeinamannIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. Smither v. Asset Acceptance, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Oxley v. LennIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Ray-Hayes v. HeinamannIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Roger S. Blackman v. Karen A. Gholson and James W. BlackmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Dollie Smith, Henry Harris, Jr., and Clarence Carter v. Wayne HaggardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API