Legal Opinion

Ogletree v. Marcus

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1961No. 38977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

This was a slander action by Sybruth Ogletree against the defendants. She was an employee of the defendants and claims she was slandered by the defendant, Earl Marcus. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict was rendered for the plain tiff for $4,727 on her first cause of action and for $10,382 on her second. Defendants filed a motion for new trial which was granted on the following grounds:

“The plaintiff herein offered into evidence, which was admitted over the objection of the defendants, the testimony of the plaintiff to the effect that the plaintiff supported her mother.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Smith v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Harper v. PrattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. FerrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Cahill v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Longmire v. LongmireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Smittle v. IllingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Turman v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. City of Ada v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Turman v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API