Legal Opinion

Turman v. Pruitt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1964No. 40245Published

1Opinion of the Court

397 P.2d 652 (1964)

Martha TURMAN, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

Jerry Edwin PRUITT, Defendant in Error.

No. 40245.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 15, 1964.

Dick Jones, Charles R. Jones, Jones & Jones, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Wm. G. Smith, Fenton, Fenton, Smith & McCaleb, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

2Per curiam

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, recovered a money judgment upon a jury verdict against defendant, for damages allegedly sustained as a result of an automobile accident. After defendant's motion for a new trial was overruled and within the time allowed by…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Houston v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. City of Duncan v. AbramsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Jones v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Gibson v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. R. & R. Motor Co. v. Kings, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API