Boswell v. Merrill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.
The defendants had judgment in the court below and plaintiff appeals therefrom. Plaintiff, the owner of a so-called service station, leased the same, together with equipment, to defendants Merrill and Jessup for a term of years. The lessees at the time of the execution of the lease deposited with the lessor a sum equal to the rent for the last three and one-half months of the lease. Among other provisions of the lease was one that provided as follows:
“It is expressly understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that upon the actual taking or use of any property…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sherman v. SandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dorcich v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Belanger v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Ehlert v. WoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Pike v. HaydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Belanger v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1954