Legal Opinion

Boswell v. Merrill

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1932No. Docket No. 7129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

The defendants had judgment in the court below and plaintiff appeals therefrom. Plaintiff, the owner of a so-called service station, leased the same, together with equipment, to defendants Merrill and Jessup for a term of years. The lessees at the time of the execution of the lease deposited with the lessor a sum equal to the rent for the last three and one-half months of the lease. Among other provisions of the lease was one that provided as follows:

“It is expressly understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that upon the actual taking or use of any property…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Sherman v. SandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dorcich v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Belanger v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Ehlert v. WoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Pike v. HaydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Belanger v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API