Legal Opinion
Feliciano v. Feliciano
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 16, 1995No. 12933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The parties’ marriage was dissolved on January 6, 1983. Because financial assistance was being furnished on behalf of a minor child under the aid to families with dependent children program (AFDC), the attorney general (hereafter state) was a party to the proceedings. General Statutes § 46b-55.1 Custody of the child was awarded to the plaintiff, with reasonable rights of visitation for the defendant. The defendant was ordered to pay $1 per year alimony, $15 per week child support and $5 per week on an arrearage owed to the state.
On January 14,1993, the state moved to modify the support order,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Castro v. CastroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Favrow v. VargasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Humphrey v. WoodsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marrocco v. GiardinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Feliciano v. FelicianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Hill v. HillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Baker v. BakerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Arias v. MacEdo, No. Fa00-0630273 (Oct. 16, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.