Ledingham v. City of Blaine
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Whatcom county, Hardin, J., entered April 3, 1918, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action to determine the validity of claims against a contractor’s bond, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
Respondent Schrimser furnished a team and driver for work upon a contract for the grading of streets in the city of Blaine, the team and driver were furnished to a subcontractor, who agreed to pay therefor $6.50 per day; $2.50 representing the man’s wages, and $4 representing pay for the use of the team. Schrimser, not having been paid, filed notice of claim against the bond furnished by the principal contractor, and in this action is asserting that claim. Schrimser did not, within ten days after beginning to furnish the use of the man and team to the subcon*254tractor, notify the principal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Hurley-Mason Co. v. American Bonding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- State Bank v. RutheWashington Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by11 opinions
- Neary v. Puget Sound Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Union Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. R. S. Armstrong & Bro.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Austin v. C. v. Wilder & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
- Western Clinic & Hospital Ass'n v. Gabriel Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Better Financial Solutions, Inc. v. Caicos Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.