Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Fleming

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before Norval, J. cited: Max-wells PI. and Pr. 301; Stewart on Husband and Wife, secs. 14-60; Snyder v. People, 26 Mich. 106, 109. cited: Albrecht v. Treitschke, 17 Neb. 205; Neihardt v. Kilmer, 12 Id. 36.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J.

The original action in this case was instituted for the recovery from the sheriff of the value of certain personal property levied upon by him by virtue of an order of attachment, and subsequently sold under an order of sale for the satisfaction of the judgment rendered in the principal case. It is contended that at the time of the seizure the property was exempt from execution. Upon a trial being had in the district court, a judgment was rendered in favor, of the defendant in error for $100 and costs of action.

Plaintiff in error brings the cause to this court for review ■ by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Biddinger v. ManlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Frazier v. SyasNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Mann v. WeltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. People ex rel. Dobson v. McClayNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Schaller v. KurtzNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jetton Lumber Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Smith v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State ex rel. Scoville v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bender v. BameNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Widemair v. WoolseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API