Legal Opinion

Schaller v. Kurtz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Wakeley, J. cited: Thompson on Homestead and Exemptions, Sec. 45. Bell v. Keaoh, 14 C. L. J., 298. Wilson v. McElroy, 32 Pa. St., 82. Waugh v. Burhet, 3 Grant Cas., 319. Wade v. Jones, 20 Mo., 75. Sallee v. Watson, 17 Ala., 482. Smyth Homestead and Exemptions, Secs. 520, 521, 524, 532, 441. Wilson v. Coohran, 31 Texas, 677. Brigham v. Bush, 33 Barb., 598.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J7

February 11, 1884, defendant in error, who is a dealer in ladies’ furnishing goods, recovered a judgment against plaintiff in error for the sum of $22.55, with costs of suit, before a justice of the peace in Douglas county. On February 20, 1885, execution was issued on the judgment, and returned unsatisfied for want of property upon which to levy. The same day one Vears was garnished, as a supposed debtor of plaintiff in error. On March 24, 1885, the garnishee answered that he was indebted to her in the sum of $16, and was thereupon ordered to pay that sum of money into court. On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. TreitschkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. SmershNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kestler v. KernIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In Re Estate of GrassmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Smith v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Hamilton v. FlemingNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. In Re Estate of GrassmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API