Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Scoville v. Wilson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original application for mandamus. cited: Tucker v. Sanford, 12 Neb., 425; Hamilton v. Fleming, 26 Id., 240; Frazier v. Syas, 10 Id., 115; People v. McClay, 2 Id., 7 ; State v. Cunningham, 6 Id., 90 ; State, ex rel. Kahoon, v. Krumpus, 13 Id., 321; Mann v. Welt on, 21 Id., 541.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, the sheriff of Saunders county, to call to his assistance three disinterested freeholders and appraise certain property claimed by the relator as exempt under section 521 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The relator is the wife of E. A. Seoville, who has absconded and his whereabouts are unknown.

In November, 1888, attachments were sued out against the said E. A. Seoville in the district court of Saunders county, and the personal property of the said defendant Seoville was levied upon. The relator then filed in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frazier v. SyasNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Mann v. WeltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hamilton v. FlemingNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Kahoon v. KrumpusNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  5. State ex rel. Tucker v. SanfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jetton Lumber Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Oliver v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Mennell v. WellsMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Johnson v. BartekNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Paul Schminke Co. v. HoldenNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API