Legal Opinion

Dunsmuir v. Port Angeles Gas, Water, Electric Light & Power Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1902No. 4335PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thad Huston, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*587The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover from defendants the amount of certain taxes levied in the years 1892, 1893 and 1894 on a system of waterworks then owned by the two first-named defendants in Clallam county, and to have the amount so paid adjudged a lien on said property, and that he may be subrogated to the rights of the county in the enforcement of said lien. The material findings of fact by the court are as follows:

“(3) That on or about the 21st day of February, 1891, the Port Angeles Gas, Water, Electric Light & Power Company, Limited, was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knighton v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  2. Packwood v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Wilkes v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Fischer v. WoodruffWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Dunsmuir v. Port Angeles Gas, Water, Electric Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Ballard v. Alaska Theatre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Diamond Ice & Storage Co. v. Klock Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Olson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Childs v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API