Legal Opinion

United States v. McLain

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 7, 1987No. 85-3399PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge:

Appellants Dennis McLain and Seymour Sher were convicted by jury trial in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida of violating the federal RICO statute 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), conspiring to commit that offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); and using extortionate means to collect an extension of credit, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894. McLain was also convicted of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Both appellants contend that the trial schedule imposed by the district court and the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. United States v. Luis Anthony RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Sher v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Robert Moss (99-1951 01-1797) and Ronald Kohn (01-1610) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Sher v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API