Legal Opinion

Wilbert v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Second Injury Reserve Account

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1940No. Appeals, 176 and 187PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

These two appeals grew out of the same claim for workmen’s compensation. They arise under the Act of July 2, 1937, P. L. 2714, which is a supplement to the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, and provides for the inclusion of certain occupational diseases within its scope.

The pertinent facts relative to the claim may be stated as follows:

On April 22, 1938 Lawrence Wilbert, residing at 2452 Leithgow Street, Philadelphia, filed a claim (No. 75,789) for compensation against his employer, Pécora Paint Company, and its insurance carrier,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Estate of MurdockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Cline's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. McLaughlin's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Baker v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Buradus v. General Cement Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Shenandoah Suburban Bus Lines, Inc., CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API