Estate of Murdock
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
Appellee claims that the decedent was her husband; and the lower court has disallowed the credit taken for payment of collateral inheritance tax and awarded her the entire net balance of his estate on account of her claims for $500 exemption and $5,000’ allowance. It is admitted that no marriage ceremony was ever performed and the evidence as to cohabitation and reputation is conflicting. A number of witnesses testified on behalf of the appellee that she and the decedent lived together in the apparent relation of man and wife for a number of years, that they were reputed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Travers v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Rose v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
- Stevenson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Jackson, ex rel. Dies v. WinneNew York Supreme Court · 1831
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Baker v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- McGrath's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Nikitka's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Stauffer EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.