Legal Opinion
State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. 0.644 Acres, More or Less
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1980No. 4861PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
The State of Alaska brings this petition for review from a judgment of dismissal in which the superior court vacated the state’s declaration of taking and divested the state of the title it had acquired in the subject condemnation action as it pertained to respondents. 1 Review has been granted because of the significance of the legal issues involved. 2
The central issue in this petition involves interpretation of the 1976 amendment to Alaska’s statutory provisions relating to declarations of taking. These amendments followed in the wake of our decision in ARCO…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Denis Hanly v. John M. Mitchell, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Arco Pipeline Co. v. 3.60 Acres, More or LessAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Chambers v. State Ex Rel. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Tongass Sport Fishing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Trustees for Alaska v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Cannone v. NoeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Ship Creek Hydraulic Syndicate v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.