Legal Opinion
Arco Pipeline Co. v. 3.60 Acres, More or Less
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1975No. 2419PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERWIN, Justice.
Petitioners are the owners and constructors of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. In order to facilitate the prompt completion of this monumental and historic project, the State of Alaska in AS 38.35.130 authorized a delegation of its power of eminent domain and permitted thereby the use by petitioners of a declaration of taking to condemn real property in the state for right-of-way purposes. 1 Pursuant to this grant, on July 15th, 1974, petitioners filed an eminent domain complaint and a declaration of taking seeking to condemn a 3.6 acre right-of-way and easement — 100 feet…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Wendell S. Wilson and Mary Ellen R. Wilson, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hafling v. Inlandboatmen's Union of the PacificAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- State v. Alaska Continental Development Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Ostrem v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
- State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. 0.644 Acres, More or LessAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.