Legal Opinion
Conda v. Christensen
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 21, 1987No. 4830PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiff, Bill Conda, a licensed real estate broker, brought this action against Carl D. Christensen, Frank Lombard, Keith Mahler and I. Kenneth Mahler to recover a real estate commission. After a prejudgment remedy hearing, the case was withdrawn against Lombard and Christensen. After a trial to the court, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff *558against the remaining defendants. From that judgment, those defendants1 appeal, claiming that the court erred (1) in finding that a cobrokerage agreement for a real estate commission need not comply with General Statutes § 20-325a, and (2) in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- City of Shelton v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Gentry v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Nagle v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. McKennaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dow Condon v. Brookfield Development, No. Cv-00-0596719s (Feb. 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Sotheby's International Realty, Inc. v. Relocation Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013