Legal Opinion
State v. McKenna
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 26, 1987No. 3728PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendant is appealing from a judgment of conviction, after a trial to a jury, of the crime of manslaughter in the second degree with a motor vehicle while intoxicated in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56b (a). The defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) in failing to find that General Statutes § 53a-56b is void for vagueness, (2) in charging the jury erroneously, (3) in admitting into evidence the results of an intoximeter test, and (4) in admitting into evidence certain photographs of the victim.
From the evidence introduced at trial, the jury could reasonably have found…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. SchriverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. LammeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. BantaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. SankoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. AllenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.