Legal Opinion
Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1987No. 86-7280PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
The California Public Utilities Commission, California Energy Resources Conser*561vation and Development Commission, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and three California electric utility companies, the petitioners here, seek review of changes proposed by the Bonneville Power Administration for its Nonfirm Energy Rate Schedules. Petitioners contend that BPA failed to hold a hearing required by the Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (the Regional Act), 16 U.S.C. §§ 839e(i) and (k) (1982), prior to adopting the new rates. Petitioners urge us to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Public Utility Commissioner Of Oregon v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- City of Seattle v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Public Utilities Commission Of The State Of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987