Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Jorgensen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1966No. 4995PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, D. J.:

We are confronted with the relevance of a defendant’s “general appearance” subsequent to a default judgment and the propriety of a trial court “reinstating” this default judgment after first setting it aside.

These and related procedural issues are outgrowths of an, automobile collision on July 22, 1961, between a car driven by defendant Michael Doyle and one driven by Bruce E. Jorgensen, on whose behalf as Guardian ad Litem, and individually, a complaint was filed by Bruce’s father, Louis Jorgensen, on July 18,1963. Named codefendant with Michael was his…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. PughTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sara A. Karlsson v. Baruch RabinowitzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  5. Commissioners of Public Works v. Cities Service Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. Sugarless Shops, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Idlewine v. Madison County Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Fritz Hansen A/S v. Eighth Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Morabito v. WachsmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Deros v. SternNevada Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API