Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant contends that his due process rights were violated by the detective’s failure to videotape his interrogation. This argument is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Hodges, 58 AD3d 642 [2009]; People v Nelson, 52 AD3d 534 [2008]; People v Rosas, 30 AD3d 545 [2006], affd 8 NY3d 493 [2007]).

The defendant failed to demonstrate that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). A review of the record in its entirety reveals that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. TongeNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. People v. RosasNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People v. RosasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. FestusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API