Legal Opinion
People v. Thomas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s claim that his due process and fair trial rights were violated by the failure of police to record his interrogation on video was sufficiently preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). However, the defendant’s claim in this regard is without merit (see People v Cass, 79 AD3d 768, 769 [2010], lv granted 17 NY3d 793 [2011]; People v Rodriguez, 68 AD3d 789 [2009]; People v Hodges, 58 AD3d 642, 642 [2009]; People v Boyd, 21 AD3d 1428, 1429 [2005]; People v Falkenstein, 288 AD2d 922, 923 [2001]).
The defendant’s contention that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MarsdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. FestusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. MarsdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015