Legal Opinion

People v. Rosas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2007PublishedCited by 53 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

*495OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of first degree murder under Penal Law § 125.27 (1) (a) (viii) for causing the deaths of two individuals during the same criminal transaction. The issue presented by this appeal is whether the resulting sentences imposed must run concurrently or consecutively to one another under Penal Law § 70.25 (2). We conclude, under the principles stated in People v Laureano (87 NY2d 640 [1996]), that the sentences must be served concurrently.

In the early morning hours of March 30, 1997, defendant broke into the apartment of his former…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. LaureanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. BrathwaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. RamirezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. People v. GradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. McKnightNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. FrazierNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. People v. CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API