Legal Opinion
Lidstrand v. Silvercrest Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 19, 1981No. 7707-4-IPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, C.J.
Plaintiffs Norman and Sherry Lidstrand brought this action to recover damages claimed to have been sustained because of defects in a mobile home manufactured by defendant Silvercrest Industries. Silvercrest appeals the trial judge's award of damages and attorney's fees in favor of the Lidstrands on theories of defective manufacture, breach of warranty, and violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86. We affirm the judgment for actual damages and reverse the judgment for punitive damages and attorney's fees under the Consumer Protection Act.
In November 1973, Mr. and Mrs. Roy…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
- Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Anhold v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Daughtry v. Jet Aeration Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Berg v. General Motors Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Klem v. Washington Mutual BankWashington Supreme Court · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.